Views on improving the integrity of global capital markets
15 February 2012

New York Stock Exchange Quietly Concedes More Power to Investors

A landmark event in U.S. corporate governance may have slipped under the radar in the wake of proxy-access private ordering and the start of the second proxy season in which “Say on Pay” is on the ballot.

The New York Stock Exchange recently stated in an information memo to its members that it would amend NYSE Rule 452 to prohibit brokers from voting on corporate governance proposals supported by company management without instructions from their clients.

This is only the latest in a series of changes that have cut back on the number of items on which brokers have discretion to vote on behalf of their clients — votes that have historically supported management.

In 2009, the SEC approved a NYSE rule to bar brokers from casting uninstructed shares in uncontested director elections. Meanwhile the Dodd-Frank Act, signed into law in 2010, forbids broker votes on executive compensation matters, including management Say-on-Pay votes.    

And in late January of this year, the NYSE stated that proposals relating to de-staggering the board of directors, majority voting in the election of directors, eliminating supermajority voting requirements, providing for the use of consents, providing rights to call a special meeting, and certain types of anti-takeover provision overrides that are included on proxy statements will be treated as “Broker May Not Vote” matters going forward. 

The NYSE did state that auditor ratification will continue to be a “Broker May Vote” matter.

Investor advocates have complained for years that uninstructed broker votes automatically cast in support of corporate initiatives amounted to “stuffing the ballot box” in favor of management.

Investors should be aware of unintended consequences. The new rule will make it more difficult for companies with supermajority requirements (such as 75 percent or 80 percent of shares outstanding) to obtain enough votes to pass shareholder-friendly management resolutions. Under the NYSE’s new interpretation, those uncast votes will be counted as dissenting votes.

About the Author(s)
Matt Orsagh, CFA, CIPM

Matt Orsagh, CFA, CIPM, is a senior director of capital markets policy at CFA Institute, where he focuses on corporate governance, ESG, and climate change analysis. He writes and speaks frequently on these topics on behalf of CFA Institute. His paper, Climate Change Analysis in the Investment Process was named “Best ESG Paper” by Savvy Investor in 2021.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close