Practical analysis for investment professionals
27 March 2013

Are Safe Withdrawal Rates Still Relevant in Today’s Low-Return Environment? (Video)

Michael E. Kitces, a partner and director of research at Pinnacle Advisory Group, a private wealth management firm, tackled the topic of safe withdrawal rates at last week’s CFA Institute Wealth Management 2013 conference in Boston. Kitces, who publishes the e-newsletter The Kitces Report and the blog Nerd’s Eye View, also provided an overview of current research on optimal withdrawal rates along with an analysis of historical safe withdrawal rates recorded in varying return environments.

In his presentation, Kitces noted that there are two fundamental client questions: How much can I safely spend from this portfolio without needing to worry about the markets? And, if I want to spend X, how much money do I need in the account to safely retire?

In a standard spreadsheet for planning a client’s retirement, you will have a ledger chart that looks something like this: starting balance + growth – withdrawals = end-of-year balance. If the numbers don’t yield a positive balance, you need to move one of the levers that will make retirement work for the client. There are really only four: save more, spend less, retire later, or die sooner.

Kitces explained that the sequences of returns matter (a lot). Disparities in the early years have a magnified effect over time, and the extent of volatility also matters.

Some of the challenges of safe withdrawal rates:

  • Given the impact of volatility, how much of a “safety margin” is necessary?
  • Given the historical returns of the markets, how high of a withdrawal rate would have survived any historical market scenario?
  • What is the optimal portfolio allocation to survive the volatility?

The key take-away from the discussion: “Safe withdrawal rates are built around ‘worst-case’ scenarios, they are not built around average returns. It has nothing to do with average returns,”  Kitces said.

While the low-return environment puts safe withdrawal rates at risk, it is not necessarily fatal to success.

Kitces has found there is a dramatic misunderstaning of what safe withdrawal rates really assume. In reality, the current return environment does not substantively violate the withdrawal rate assumptions — it actually matches the assumptions. (Safe withdrawal rates never assumed average returns; they’re built for 0%-real-return environments.)

For more on this topic, see his related blog posts: What Returns Are Safe Withdrawal Rates REALLY Based Upon? (August 2012) and Safe Withdrawal Rates In Today’s Low Yield Environment – Walking On The Edge Of A Cliff? (February 2013).

At the upcoming CFA Institute Wealth Management Conference, which will be held in Garden Grove, CA, 19–20 February 2014, Kitces will be discussing social media strategies for financial planners and investment advisers. You can view the event listing on our website.

About the Author(s)
Lauren Foster

Lauren Foster is managing editor of Enterprising Investor and co-lead of CFA Institute’s Women in Investment Management initiative. Previously, she worked as a freelance writer for Barron’s and the Financial Times. Prior to her freelance work, Foster spent nearly a decade on staff at the FT as a reporter and editor based in the New York bureau. Foster holds a BA in political science from the University of Cape Town, and an MS in journalism from Columbia University.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close