Practical analysis for investment professionals
01 May 2020

Book Review: The Man Who Solved the Market

The Man Who Solved the Market: How Jim Simons Launched the Quant Revolution. 2019. Gregory Zuckerman. Penguin Random House.

James Simons is a billionaire hedge fund manager whom even Bernie Sanders might like: a brilliant, decent, relaxed, charismatic, self-aware man deeply concerned with America’s growing inequality and deteriorating educational system. He has devoted his considerable fortune to curing autism, to improving math education in the public schools, and to solving the ultimate mysteries of the origins of life and the universe. In addition, he is an award-winning mathematician who helped solve some of the Cold War’s thorniest code-breaking problems, a job he lost through a letter to the editor against the Vietnam War, following which he built the math department at SUNY Stony Brook into a world-class academic powerhouse. And not to mention, he is arguably the world’s most successful investor and one of its wealthiest inhabitants.

Subscribe Button

In short, he has lived a life that begs for a biographer. The only problem for the Wall Street Journal’s Gregory Zuckerman in assuming that role was Simons’s intense privacy and the impenetrable silence that surrounded all who knew him. Zuckerman surmounted those formidable barriers with dogged investigative persistence and good timing in the form of the tongue-loosening wrought by the impending demise of Simons’s now elderly early collaborators.

For investment professionals, Zuckerman’s work will go down like a generous serving of chocolate mousse — at once both pleasurable and satisfying — but not for the reason that will attract them to the book. Indeed, in the 31 years from 1988 through 2018, the Medallion Fund — the flagship of Simons’s Renaissance Technologies — achieved a breathtaking 69% gross return (39% after fees that eventually rose to a staggering 5-and-44) by grossly violating weak-form market efficiency; price and volume movements do, in fact, affect future prices. Alas, Zuckerman spills little secret sauce and parts no kimonos; after all, Medallion’s continued success depends on its operational opacity.

Renaissance Technologies began in the early 1980s by painstakingly digging out massive amounts of data from primary documentary sources, supplemented with virgin electronic data. It then brought the skills of world-class mathematicians and supercomputer-equipped data scientists to bear on these data within a multidimensional matrix to reveal correlations and patterns invisible to the naked eye in a looping optimization process that repeated several times per hour. Finally, the attendant strategies were executed with simultaneous trades in numerous securities. (Renaissance is not a high-frequency trader; it typically holds positions for days or weeks.) Trying to draw trading wisdom from Renaissance’s success is akin to improving your basketball handling and perimeter behavior by watching videos of LeBron James — the main problem being you are not LeBron James.

Equally important to Renaissance’s success were those from whom they earned those eye-popping returns: their competitors, typified by (in Simons’s words) “the manager of a global hedge fund who is guessing on a frequent basis the direction of the French bond market.” (Or, as stated more piquantly by one of Simons’s colleagues, “It’s a lot of dentists.”) The message for the average money manager could not be more clear: When you transact, it is likely against Jim Simons or someone like him (D.E. Shaw being the most obvious alternative example), so trade as little as possible.

Financial Analysts Journal Ad

Renaissance’s success was in no way preordained; it suffered several near-death experiences along the way. Readers will be gratified to learn that the apparently hyper-rational Simons was as much a slave to humankind’s emotionally driven loss-aversion myopia as the rest of us. He responded to the bumps in the market history of the past few decades — even the mild one of late 2018 — with a momentary loss of faith in his trading system, and on at least one occasion, he even overrode it with panicked sales. In psych-speak, humans exhibit “algorithm aversion.” If anyone should have been resistant to this phenomenon, it was Simons, yet one can only wonder how even he would have responded to, for example, a market decline on the scale of 1929–1932.

Another lesson for investment professionals: The most truly skilled investment managers privatize their returns; they do not want or need your money. Only for its first five years did Medallion remain open to outside investors, after which they were given the boot. Thereafter, the fund became the exclusive preserve of Renaissance’s owners and employees.

Zuckerman has spun a page-turning yarn that will both delight and inform readers of all stripes and expertise. It is that rare book that will appeal to both charterholders and a general audience. He beautifully describes the collaborative nature of the Renaissance organization, which brought together multiple individuals with unique skill sets, each of whom was necessary but not sufficient for its success. Absent even one of them, the enterprise would not have excelled as it did.

Renaissance’s outsized returns, in fact, flowed more from Simons’s deft management of the hundreds of number theorists, quantum physicists, and artificial intelligence PhDs under his command than from his own formidable mathematical genius. (Notably, the firm generally avoided hires with finance backgrounds.) It was no small feat to meld this battalion of highly accomplished but temperamental prima donnas. Time and again, Simons was able to patch over the seemingly irreconcilable differences that plagued the organization.

One of those prima donnas, Robert Mercer, provided an object lesson in the law of unintended consequences. While Simons generously supported a left-leaning agenda, Mercer’s support of Breitbart News, Steve Bannon, and Cambridge Analytica proved far more powerful on the conservative side, arguably providing Donald Trump’s margin of victory in the 2016 election.

One Renaissance employee, David Magerman, was fired for objecting strongly to Mercer’s politics, an episode that paradoxically shone a bright light on the pot of organizational glue that held Renaissance together: the ability of employees to invest in Medallion, perhaps the greatest employment perk known to humankind. When Magerman sued the firm over his discharge, it settled by granting him the effortless wealth offered by access to Medallion.

Ad for Research Foundation Review 2019

If one can fault the author for anything, it is for failing to answer the ultimate conundrum involving modern financial capitalism’s most rarefied heights, as epitomized by Renaissance: Exactly what purpose does it serve?

Clearly, the quant hedge fund business has little to do with the primary societal purpose of capital markets — the efficient allocation of capital to productive enterprises. Rather, it is a zero-sum game that transfers wealth from those endowed with skill and luck to those less well endowed with them. Whatever capital it generates is debited from other participants, yielding an attendant fearsome concentration of the nation’s wealth, a process of which Jim Simons is the master. (The time-honored rationalization of the hedge fund industry is, “We supply liquidity.” Of course, it supplies this liquidity until it is really needed; whenever you hear that refrain, hold on tight to your wallet.)

Zuckerman leaves it to the reader to pose these questions: Were quantitative hedge fund managers to suddenly disappear, would they be missed? Or might the world be a better place without them?

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.

All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

Select articles are eligible for Professional Learning (PL) credit. Record credits easily using the CFA Institute Members App, available on iOS and Android.

About the Author(s)
William J. Bernstein

William J. Bernstein is a neurologist, co-founder of Efficient Frontier Advisors, an investment management firm, and has written several titles on finance and economic history. He has contributed to the peer-reviewed finance literature and has written for several national publications, including Money Magazine and The Wall Street Journal. He has produced several finance titles, and also three volumes of history, The Birth of Plenty, A Splendid Exchange, and Masters of the Word, about, respectively, the economic growth inflection of the early 19th century, the history of world trade, and the effects of access to technology on human relations and politics. He was also the 2017 winner of the James R. Vertin Award from CFA Institute.

2 thoughts on “Book Review: The Man Who Solved the Market”

  1. Norbert Mittwollen says:

    Thanks for this interesting review, Bill. In my view, Renaissance Technologies and its rightful competitors do make the investment world a better place.

    Above all, Jim Simons is an admired and shining role model. It has encouraged many skilled quants to stand up against never-ending bashing as charlatans by efficient market dogmatists. As known, for them tried and true systematic trend following is still “an ancient tale with no empirical support.”

    Thus encouraged by Jim, many talented quants developed a truly alternative, i.e. non-correlated source of return by exploiting macro trend inefficiencies in futures markets. In this cost-effective way, they achieved adequately reliable returns and risks at a similar level as equity funds after costs for their clients. Besides E.D. Shaw there are diverse well-managed and -performing quant HFs or CTAs, e.g., Abraham Trading Company, AQR, Dunn, Man AHL, Winton…

    This encouraging development also contributed to the breakthrough of Robert Shiller’s Behavioral Finance and Andrew Lo’s unifying Adaptive Market Hypothesis. Andrew demonstrates it’s benefits also practically through the AlphaSimplex Group, he founded. Of course, it primarily offers a systematic trend-following Managed Futures fund with several billions USD of AUM at fair conditions.

    Thus, these quants increasingly democratize this tremendously beneficial systematic investment approach now, see for example by Niels Kaastrup-Larsen for more on that. The acknowledged scientific basis is that “price and volume movements do, in fact, affect future prices”, as you mentioned. This is due to and sustained by the losses, flowing without end from the large majority of less illuminated hedge fund managers and masses of other market gamblers.

    In my view it is quite fortunate that the losses of these folks can now be systematically exploited and redistributed to more rational people with certainly better uses for the gained money through increasingly common regulated MF or CTA funds. They have been some of the most effective alternatives for diversifying the high risks of equity investments, particularly in stormy times like now, by a simple buy&hold approach without the opportunity costs of low-yielding investments.

    Better focus on those CTAs, less outstanding than RT, but nevertheless expected to generate
    adequately risk-adjusted, non-correlated returns at fair market conditions. However, they are much less expected to privatize or close too soon.

    In addition to providing needed liquidity – at least most of the time – these funds also do contribute substantially to market efficiency and thus to more efficient allocation of capital to productive enterprises as long as they outperform. This is because they eliminate more and more (macro-)inefficiencies in the markets by systematically exploiting them. Or why not?

  2. What Jim Simons/ Renaissance does….I am not sure who will be able to replicate it. Was very happy to read he is making good use of the money he is making 👍

    Yes it is a zero sum game indeed but it is important wealth is transferred to hands where it will be best used to serve mankind as a whole.

    Was on a video call with my class of 1991 yesterday and learnt that The Gates Foundation is behind a lot of the COVID vaccines being developed globally…but this is something that is not a part of mainstream news! That’s wealth created by your brilliance being put to good use 😊

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.