CFA Institute Weighs in with the U.S. SEC on IFRS

Categories: Financial Reporting, IFRS, US SEC

On 7 July the U.S. SEC sponsored a series of roundtables designed to help determine whether incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) into the U.S. financial reporting system is in the best interest of U.S. investors and markets.  

Commentators’ coverage of this event — which featured three separate roundtables representing investors, smaller public companies, and regulators — has been varied, with a range of opinions regarding the views expressed by the participants. Some even voiced the concern that investor participants were stacked by the SEC in favor of those who support incorporating IFRS into the U.S. financial reporting system.

CFA Institute was represented in the roundtable by Gerald I. White, CFA, chair of the Corporate Disclosure Policy Council (CDPC), which addresses issues affecting the quality of financial reporting and disclosure worldwide. White has been a financial analyst and investment adviser for more than 40 years.

The following topics were discussed in the session:

* U.S. investors’ current knowledge of IFRS and preparedness for potential incorporation.

* How and when U.S. investors educate themselves on changes in accounting standards.

* Extent, logistics, and timing necessary to undertake changes to improve investor understanding of IFRS.

* Potential methods of incorporation.

There was limited discussion about the possible methods of incorporating IFRS in the U.S. financial reporting system (i.e., adoption of IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), or regional/national incorporation of IFRS — either through convergence, endorsement, or some combination). The discussion centered mostly on matters regarding how investors use financial statements, investor education, and who should interpret the principles-based standards.   

CFA Institute Support for High-Quality Global Accounting Standards

During his remarks, White pointed out that CFA Institute, an organization with a global membership, is a longtime supporter of a single set of high-quality global accounting standards. This position is backed by a CFA Institute survey conducted in June 2010 in which 94 percent of the respondents worldwide (88 percent of U.S. respondents) supported the objective of a single set of global, high-quality, understandable, and enforceable accounting standards. How to reach that goal is the main challenge, White stressed, adding that the lack of investor representation on the IASB and its governing body at the IFRS Foundation trustee level are among the other challenges being faced. 

Interpretation of IFRS

White indicated that, although CFA Institute membership supports a single financial reporting language, the expectation is that ultimately there will be a common financial reporting language, but with different “dialects.” That is, jurisdictions adopting IFRS will interpret and enforce IFRS to suit their own needs. For the U.S., the expectation is that IFRS will be interpreted by the SEC. 

To that end, there was considerable discussion regarding the role that various stakeholders, such as regulators and public accounting firms, currently play in interpreting principles-based standards, with White and others suggesting that the SEC consider how IFRS would be interpreted and applied. And rather than leaving the interpretation of the standards to others, such as large public accounting firms and regulatory enforcement actions, the IASB should fund and support a more robust interpretation effort.

Transition

White also expressed the view, with regard to the transition to IFRS, that CFA Institute membership strongly favors retrospective application to the prospective approach mentioned in the SEC Staff Paper on IFRS. A retrospective application will improve comparability, which is a cornerstone of decision-useful financial statements.

Investor Education

On the subject of investor knowledge of IFRS, White remarked that CFA Institute has included IFRS in its exam curriculum for many years but that knowledge of IFRS varies, particularly among investors who follow U.S. companies only. He also noted that there is broad, but not deep, knowledge of IFRS by investors so that, even if the SEC allowed additional time for incorporating IFRS, it would not likely boost investor education in the interim, as most analysts focus on accounting changes when they happen, not in advance.

View an archived webcast of the SEC’s recent IFRS roundtables. Interested investors are encouraged to comment directly on the SEC Staff Paper on IFRS.

For more information, view the recent CFA Institute webcast on the “SEC’s Release on Incorporating IFRS into the U.S. Financial Reporting System: Investor Considerations.”

2 comments on “CFA Institute Weighs in with the U.S. SEC on IFRS

  1. I find the article very irtsneeting and am surprised that despite the fact that the United States are slowly shifting from GAAP to IFRS, the first one is still predominant. Unification of the accounting standards would be beneficial to global economy and could effectively increase transparency. As of now, GAAP may be interpreted differently by various parties therefore could cause many discrepancies and hidden facts. A main difference between the two accounting standards is the fact that the US GAAP leaves much room for interpretation in terms of the capital and capital maintenance during the recession while IFRS includes more variables for justification within similar global scenario. If collided with IFRS it could be difficult for the companies investing in foreign markets to remain transparent, or simply credible. The SEC should accelerate the shift as the major US trade partners, such as the EU, China, and Brazil, have already shifted or are during its process.

  2. Matt Waldron, CPA said:

    Thank you for your comment. We continue to monitor the developments related to the U.S. SEC’s thinking on adoption of IFRS.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>