Practical analysis for investment professionals
23 April 2014

Is Leverage Good or Bad?

“Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.” Archimedes

Keen observers of the financial markets and dedicated readers of the financial press over time would be forgiven for being somewhat confused by the oscillating views on financial “leverage” in the perception of market participants.

Subscribe Button

Depending on the sector, context, time period, and perspective, perceptions of financial leverage can change dramatically as outlined in the following table.

Is Leverage Good or Bad?

So, what makes leverage good, and what makes it bad? Let’s start by clarifying our definition of “financial leverage” (which is also called financial “gearing” in the United Kingdom and Australia). We define financial leverage as the process of borrowing capital to make an investment, with the expectation that the profits made from the investment will be greater than the interest on the debt.

Immediately, we can see that the level of interest to be paid is critical to the leverage proposition. With very low interest rates, many more investments meet the expected minimum hurdle of returning the interest paid and vice versa. Some would even say that ultra-low interest rates create an unhealthy misallocation of capital resources (i.e., inducing investors to make investments that have insufficient returns over the long term).

The next point to note is that many tax regimes create an incentive in favor of leverage by making interest paid tax deductible — again, creating a somewhat unhealthy bias toward increasing debt levels. From an after-tax cash flow perspective, the government is, in effect, subsidizing a portion of the interest expense.

The third significant aspect, which may appear obvious but bears noting, is that leverage increases the volatility in the value of the investment. To take a simple example, if one invests 50% and borrows 50% to pay for an asset, when the asset value goes up or down 10%, the investment value increases or loses 20% of its value. So, if you invest in equities, to the extent that the firms in which you invest have net borrowings, you are making a leveraged investment. All else being equal, stocks with higher debt/equity ratios are generally more volatile than those with lower debt/equity ratios, although the actual volatility ultimately depends on the stability, duration, and productivity of the firms’ assets.

Financial Analysts Journal Current Issue Tile

Leverage Status Quo

With this rudimentary review of the characteristics of leverage, let’s take a look at the status quo with respect to total leverage in one of the most developed countries in the world, the United States.

Screen Shot 2014-04-16 at 5.51.41 PMScreen Shot 2014-04-16 at 5.51.51 PM

Unfortunately, the United States is not an exception in leverage and interest rate trends historically. Similar but different patterns exist for the United Kingdom, Japan, and many other advanced economies. So, does this mean that investments have expanded dramatically? Is any of this debt for consumption? Do the investments financed by this leverage return more than the interest paid on debt? Is principal being periodically repaid? Is the debt financing productive assets? What would be the effect of increasing interest rates?

These are the right questions to ask.

Tile for Puzzles of Inflation, Money, and Debt: Applying the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level

Relationship of Leverage to Productivity

A renowned but less-quoted economist of the 20th century, Hyman Minsky, distinguished between three types of debt. In the first and ideal type of debt, loans would be paid back with profits from purchased assets (“hedge financing”). In the second type of debt, profits from the asset purchased merely paid the interest on the debt (“speculative finance”). In the third type of debt, the asset being financed was required to be sold at ever higher prices in order to sustain profitability (“Ponzi finance”). Minsky suggested in his financial instability hypothesis that capitalist economies tended to move from hedge finance to speculative and Ponzi finance over prolonged periods of prosperity.

John Mauldin, the investment author and commentator, drives home the point that the problem of slow economic growth is not because of the lack of consumption but because of the lack of income. All else being equal, increased productivity increases income for labour and capital. So, if leverage increases productivity, then it is “good” leverage. However, if it merely creates goods purchases for current consumption, then it is “bad” leverage.

Finally, Ray Dalio, the legendary hedge fund manager at Bridgewater Associates, makes the following prescient points in his 30-minute video “How the Economic Machine Works”:

  • Credit is bad when it finances overconsumption without paying back debt.
  • Credit is good when it efficiently allocates resources and produces income so that debt can be paid back.
  • Income needs to grow faster than debt, but productivity needs to rise faster than income, so raising productivity is paramount.

Book jackets of Financial Market History: Reflections on the Past for Investors Today


  1. Leverage is neither inherently good nor bad. Leverage amplifies the good or bad effects of the income generation and productivity of the assets in which we invest.
  2. Be aware of the potential impact of leverage inherent in your investments, both positive and negative, and the volatility therein.
  3. Analyze the potential changes in the costs of leverage of your investments, in particular an eventual increase in interest rates.
  4. Invest in top- and bottom-line growth, not just in increasing asset prices.
  5. Invest in productivity enhancement broadly; in other words, invest in creating economic well-being to satisfy human needs.

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.

All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: Public domain; courtesy of the Annenberg Rare Book & Manuscript Library, University of Pennsylvania

Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.

About the Author(s)
Tim Nuding, CFA

Tim Nuding, CFA is the Chief Executive of Prosperity Capital Services LLP, a firm that provides research and consulting services for alternative investments. Tim is also the Founder of the Hedge Fund Research Club, sponsored by the CFA Society of the UK and CAIA London chapter. Tim formerly managed international asset management and investment banking businesses for Citibank and Dresdner Bank in the UK and Japan. He received his CFA charter in 2000 and is active in the CFA Society of the UK and the CFA Institute.

6 thoughts on “Is Leverage Good or Bad?”

  1. Maham says:

    Great article
    Some basic rules which normally forgotten !
    Linking leverage to productivity n income generation really good point
    Look forward to more interesting articles

  2. Albert says:

    Hi, don’t understand the illustration in the article: how does 50/50 debt/equity ration cause an asset to increase/decrease by 20%? It seems to be a 1:1 ratio as against a 2:1 where 2 is debt and 1 is equity. Please educate me.

    1. R. Barry Ellis says:

      The numerator of your return on investment would be unchanged by the financing. However, if half your investment were borrowed, your denominator would be only half as much.

  3. Kirk Cornwell says:

    I’ve heard advice as simple as “buy debt” (and it didn’t mean bonds).

  4. Tigist says:

    Very interesting article with detailed information on Leverage. It really addresses the question of when Leverage will be good and when it will be bad.

    Right now, the Federal Treasury office is making consecutive tax hikes with the purpose of controlling inflation. This really discourages buyers of goods like homes and cars since the bigger interest rate makes the mortgage payments high and unaffordable.

    By the same token, will it help the Fed inflation controlling effort if policymakers go with the direction of minimizing or eliminating some of the tax advantage associated with Leverage?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.