Practical analysis for investment professionals
25 January 2016

Wealth Management Technology: What’s Next?

Wealth Management Technology: What’s Next?

Evolutions in technology continue to have a major impact on private client wealth management. To get perspective on notable and overlooked developments in this area, CFA Institute Magazine asked Joel Bruckenstein, president of Technology Tools for Today in Miramar, Florida, and Jamie McIntyre, founder of Rewire Capital in Darnestown, Maryland, for their thoughts on the major current and developing tech trends influencing private wealth managers’ work with clients.

Living with Robos

Joel Bruckenstein (Technology Tools for Today): When robo-advisers first came out, there was a little bit of a misconception about what they were. I think most people in the industry looked at it as a business model, and they said, “This business model is never going to work.” I look at it differently from most people because I’m a technologist and I’m agnostic on the business model. But I always thought that the technology in some instances was superior to what the typical adviser was providing to his or her clients and something that advisers should be embracing.

For example, I think the onboarding experience that you get with a robo is superior to what you get if you go to an RIA [registered investment adviser] firm. If you go to an RIA firm and a lot of other firms, you still have to print out paper, fill out the paperwork — fill it in with a pen — and get a wet signature. Some folks are still either faxing or emailing that stuff over to the custodian or the broker/dealer. I may be waiting a number of days for an account to open and get funded, whereas with the robo-adviser, if you’re funding it with cash, you can pretty much do it just about instantaneously. Another difference is the client portal experience. The robo-adviser’s client can log on and see what they have at any time, 24/7, on any device.

I think there are two alternatives with robos from a business perspective. You either have to embrace them or not, and if you don’t, it’s probably going to be detrimental to your business in the long run. The way I look at robos is, it’s not just about serving your current clients; it’s also about the pipeline of future clients. When I started in this business, people didn’t approach advisers until they had what they thought was a reasonable amount of assets, and then they went maybe from a self-service model or a balanced mutual fund or something like that to an adviser.

I don’t think that’s the way it’s going to be in the future. A lot of Gen X and Gen Y [people] are going to go, whether we like it or not, to some kind of digital platform. It can either be your digital platform or something that’s a direct-to-consumer platform. If they go to a direct-to-consumer platform, they may never take the step then to go to an adviser; they may go instead to that direct-to-consumer provider for those services.

Crowd-Enabled Technology

Jamie McIntyre (Rewire Capital): I’m passionate about the impact that crowd-enabling technologies are having on finance. The majority of the advisers I speak with don’t have a clue that this is happening. Not only do they need to be aware of these new platforms before their clients are, but I believe they should be advising and allocating a small portion of clients’ assets in these new offerings.

In 2012, the JOBS [Jumpstart Our Business Startups] Act set forth legislation on crowdfunding. The SEC has provided a ruling that gives guidance on how to use Title II of the JOBS Act. That ruling allowed people for the first time to generally solicit private investments, online primarily, but they could only do it to accredited investors. But even still, this was a massive change in the industry.

You see some hedge funds starting to use this mechanism, but for early-stage investing, it became a new mechanism to find angel investments and series A investments in private companies. Prior to that, you had to work your own local networks and angel groups. A very, very limited number of people were involved, and there was no real way to be able to get at those people unless you went through your own networks. That is one reason Silicon Valley was able to boom, because they became a hub for that angel investment. Now what you see are online portals that have taken these potential private equity investments and are soliciting them online to accredited investors. One portal that I have invested in is called SeedInvest.

SeedInvest’s vision has always been to foster a private market for the masses. Recent regulation changes have enabled them to use their platform to facilitate the first online private equity offering to non-accredited investors. In June 2015, the SEC updated one of their rules and created something called Reg A+. Reg A+ is outside of the JOBS Act, and it lets people do something that is being referred to in the industry as a mini-IPO. A private company can now raise money from non-accredited investors if it follows the process that’s set forth in Reg A+.

It’s a two-stage process. The first stage is what they call “test the waters.” Companies can solicit interest. They test the waters to see if there is enough investor interest in their company to go through the process that it’s going to take to launch a mini-IPO. On SeedInvest, I’ve seen two companies that have already gone through this phase. One’s called WayBetter, which has an application called DietBet. It’s an online app that allows people to bet [on themselves] to lose weight. They have over 270,000 players from around the world that together have lost a total of over 3 million pounds. The other one is called Snapwire, which is a new way for photographers to compete on mini-proposals. It’s crowd-focused online photography. Buyers submit a certain job that they want to get photos for. People post their photos and then the buyer selects the photos that they like. Both of those companies have indicated interest north of $10 million.

I talked with the CEO of WayBetter [Jamie Rosen in New York City], and he said that investment interest is primarily coming in chunks of $1,000. This is really his customer base, the people that are using his app to lose weight, who are saying, “We want to participate and buy a piece of this company.” That’s going to create a massive band of incentivized evangelists, if you will, inspired to help grow his company. So, not only is he getting the capital for the company, but he’s getting capital from the people that use his apps and can actually make a difference in supporting his company in growing its community.

It’s a fraction of the cost of a traditional IPO, especially from a legal standpoint, and there’s really no investment bank involved. The platform that would be driving this mini-IPO forward gets paid a fee to help raise the money that is minimal compared with what an investment bank would charge.

With regard to why financial advisers should be leading the charge, one reason is that clients will have questions because of the amount of attention that I think this space is going to get over the coming year. I also believe that early-stage investing makes sense to be a part of certain people’s portfolios, because it reconnects people with the fundamental principles of investing — it allows them to invest with purpose. [It’s] not necessarily impact investing, but they can invest their money with a purpose.

Adding Advisory Value

Joel Bruckenstein (Technology Tools for Today): Another trend goes hand in hand with the robos. If you believe, at least for the mass affluent clients, that investment advice is being commoditized, what’s left? What’s left is true financial planning. So, you see all kinds of firms that were primarily investment driven — and not so interested in providing financial-planning advice — much more interested in it today. For the first time in many years, you’re seeing a renaissance in financial-planning software. There are more players trying to come into the market. Envestnet just bought Finance Logix, for example. A lot of independent broker/dealer (IBD) firms that weren’t really encouraging their advisers all that much to do true financial planning are now encouraging them to do it. I think it’s going to be harder and harder to add value versus a market benchmark or a blended market benchmark, but there’s still a lot of value to be added in other areas of financial planning, whether it’s income tax planning, estate planning, risk management, etc. That area of the marketplace is heating up.

A New Real Estate Play?

Jamie McIntyre (Rewire Capital): Another example [of crowd-enabling technologies] is Patch of Land, which is somewhat similar to Lending Club, an online peer-to-peer lending platform. Instead of funding personal credit card debt like Lending Club loans, Patch of Land funds refurbishing projects for housing. They take a single-family home that a developer wants to purchase, refurbish, and then sell. Patch of Land’s underwriting system will determine the viability of that developer being able to do that, doing it on time, being able to sell it at a profit, and then they will back that developer. They pre-fund and give that developer the loan. They then put all of their research (about the property and the loan) online and let the crowd pick the individual investments that they want to back. Those investments are backed by not only the developer but by the actual asset, the house that was purchased. The typical loan period is maybe 12 months or so, but I’m seeing rates of return anywhere from 10% to 18%. Investments like these being offered online are brand new. Nobody knows about it, and it is often offering a much better return than the public markets, especially with the amount of assets that are backing these individual debt instruments. They seem like a very high-quality and high-interest-rate return that a lot of investors just aren’t aware of.

Big Data’s Impact

Joel Bruckenstein (Technology Tools for Today): Another trend that’s sort of still on the horizon that everybody talks about but in the financial service space is still underutilized is big data. Over the next year or so, we’ll start seeing a lot more firms emerging, both existing firms and new firms, that are trying to help people that have the data — from the individual RIA firm up to the custodians — make better use of the data that they already have. Think about how much data the custodians and the IBDs have. Are they really making the best use of that data, or are there things that they can monetize in some form to help their advisers grow?

For example, the CRM (customer relationship management) vendors to advisers are starting to put what they call analytic dashboards in their software to show some very simple metrics, like the average age of your client, just to see who’s doing what in the office, who your best clients are, where your growth is coming from (if there is growth), so you can find more clients (like the ones who are growing) faster and spot problems in workflows.

This article originally ran in the November/December 2015 issue of CFA Institute Magazine.

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: ©iStockphoto.com/reportman1985

About the Author(s)
Ed McCarthy

Ed McCarthy is an author and freelance finance writer who covered private wealth topics for CFA Institute Magazine. He has written for many of the financial service industry’s leading publications, including Bloomberg Wealth Manager, Institutional Investor online, Financial Planning, Journal of Accountancy, and the Journal of Financial Planning.

2 thoughts on “Wealth Management Technology: What’s Next?”

  1. Thanks Ed,

    I’d like to know who is pursuing BI and client-data to produce more optimal outcomes for private clients who cannot/or should not be conformed to a mass-produced model. We live in a world of smarter phones and medicine, customized burritos and sneakers, selfies; yet, fintech is often just scaling standardization, retrofit institutional solutions, and overly simplified product-centric advice. Finance has the opportunity to be the greatest 1:1 Enterprise of all-time as trillions in legacy assets transfer (lots of unique data/requirements and no real inventory or substitution constraints). Families deserve, require, and desire custom solutions shaped on unique quantitative, qualitative, and behavioral circumstances. Smart-decision support tools that help a human fiduciary efficiently deploy advice across ALL aspects of the integrated goals-based wealth management spectrum will truly be futuristic and differentiated!

  2. Mike A says:

    I called Wealthfront 2 years ago asking if they would like to partner or private label their service, but at the time they had no interest. Is anyone aware of a robo firm that is willing to partner with an RIA’s practice? I don’t want something as ridiculous at Schwab’s mandatory cash allocation, but if a more reasonable workable model were available, especially for taxable accounts, I’d be very interested.
    Thanks,
    Mike

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close