Practical analysis for investment professionals
09 March 2018

Portfolio Managers, Artificial Intelligence Is Coming for Your Jobs

This is the second installment in a three-part series exploring the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on investment management. I want to thank the speakers at the AI and the Future of Financial Services Forum, hosted by CFA Institute and CFA Society Beijing, for inspiring this series. The first installment offered a primer on the AI technologies that are relevant to investment professionals.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is coming to the investment world.

With the help of deep learning techniques, AI researchers have made significant strides in natural language processing (NLP), speech recognition, and image recognition. Computers can now see, hear, and understand human beings. They have also demonstrated shrewd decision making.

What does this mean for investment management professionals?

In December 2017, we invited some of the brightest minds in AI and investing to discuss how AI is transforming the investment business at the AI and the Future of Financial Services Forum in Beijing. Their collective conclusion was nothing short of mindboggling: AI will eventually replace most, if not all, investment managers.

Let’s walk through their reasoning step by step.

Deeper Analysis

By such common standards of intelligence as language skills, mathematical skills, and memory, computers are gaining an edge over humans. That margin will only grow wider over time. Will that edge translate into better investment skills?

“The biggest advantage of a computer [over a human being] is its practically unlimited memory,” Eric Chang of Microsoft Research Asia explained. The 152-layer-deep neural network his team at Microsoft developed can tell what’s in a picture with more accuracy than humans.

Training such complex models requires a tremendous amount of data, more and more of which has become available in recent years. “Data alone is not enough though,” Chang said. “Our focus is on getting insights from the data.”

Tang Xiaodong, CFA, CEO of China Asset Management, gave the audience an example of such insight. Investors have used image recognition programs to find oil tankers on satellite imagery. “Some have been able to get a better gauge on oil supply by analyzing the tankers’ tonnage, routing, and port arrival times,” he said.

Many analysts listen to quarterly conference calls from corporate management to detect clues that they can use to estimate corporate earnings and build valuation models. “With the help of voice recognition programs,” Tang said, “they can zoom in on a small number of companies where AI raises a red flag based on changes in management’s speech patterns.”

Shu Ming of Lingfeng Capital explained how one of their portfolio companies applied AI algorithms to help a bank client evaluate its risk exposure to a potentially problematic borrower:

“We used NLP and knowledge maps to go through regulatory filings, legal proceedings, and online information about related transactions, company ownership structures, business transactions, loan guarantees, and key personnel movements to map out corporate relations. The program detected over 800 accounts related to the problematic borrower. The banks originally thought there were four.”

Better Decisions

Chang said that Microsoft applies its image recognition models to understand investor personalities. They can then harvest that data to build more customized portfolios, demonstrating how deep analysis can inform better decisions.

Better investment decisions come, in part, from more precise asset pricing. More-in-depth analysis provides more accurate inputs for valuation models. For example, if the information on oil tankers gives you an edge over your competition in forecasting oil prices, it will also help you better model revenues and costs for oil companies and airlines. If your program succeeds in catching CEOs in their mistruths on conference calls, you’ll likely capture alpha by selling those companies when you hold them and avoiding them when you don’t. And is still capable of accomplishing so much more.

AI’s freedom from emotions and behavioral biases should also lead to better investment decisions. Although neural networks operate in different ways than a typical quant model, they share that same lack of emotions. (More on the difference in the next post.) And as the saying goes, “The market does not beat them. They beat themselves . . . ”

Behavioral biases will continue to influence our investment decisions, often to our detriment. For example, investment managers are often prone to herding, or following the crowd. At the height of the tech bubble, for example, too many investors chased a stock simply because management added a .com to the company name.

But machines won’t follow the next machine. Unless we program them to do so.

The End Game

“To invest successfully over a lifetime . . . what’s needed is a sound intellectual framework for making decisions and the ability to keep emotions from corroding that framework,” Warren Buffett wrote in his preface to Benjamin Graham’s The Intelligent Investor, which Buffett described as “the best book about investing ever written.”

Given AI’s superior brain power and lack of emotions, Tang believes the market will eventually be dominated by a small number of AI programs, maybe even a single one: “If an algorithm eventually beats all the rest, you’ll have to either hand over your money for it to manage or withdraw from the market entirely,” he said. “You cannot afford to keep losing.”

Case in point: The Man Group, a hedge fund, had an AI program manage a small portion of the assets in one of its largest funds. By 2015, the AI accounted for roughly half the profits.

AI also has support in academic circles. Campbell R. Harvey of Duke University believes AI will assume a major role in investment decision making and that the proliferation of AI and big data will result in “15 to 25 investment management superpowers that can harvest all that data.”

So the big question is when — not if — AI will supplant human investment managers.

At the 71st CFA Institute Annual Conference in Hong Kong, David Pope, CFA, will discuss natural language processing (NLP) and corporate earnings sentiment analysis.

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: ©Getty Images/ nevarpp

About the Author(s)
Larry Cao, CFA

Larry Cao, CFA, is director of content at CFA Institute, where he serves as a thought leader for Asia-focused content, events, and conferences. Previously, he served as senior client education and product communications manager for the Asia-Pacific region at HSBC. Cao also served as a fixed-income portfolio manager at the People’s Bank of China. He also worked at Munder Capital Management, where he managed US and international equity portfolios, and at Morningstar, where he developed financial planning solutions and managed asset allocation strategies for a global financial institution clientele. Cao was a visiting scholar at the MIT Sloan School of Management and holds an MBA from the University of Notre Dame.

9 thoughts on “Portfolio Managers, Artificial Intelligence Is Coming for Your Jobs”

  1. Excellent Take Lary!

    1. Larry Cao, CFA says:

      Thanks for visiting our blog and leave your comments, Rahu!

  2. Reuben says:

    What Implications does this have for the Investment Management student currently studying to be a CFA charterholder ? What needs will there be for us if we are not needed ?Should we all just become computer scientists ?

    1. Larry Cao, CFA says:

      Great questions, Reuben. You’ll find answers to many of these, and more, in the next installment of this series, where we discuss the road map of AI adoption in the investment business.

      The bigger question remains: what will human beings do once AI and robots take over the majority of what we do?

  3. Gary Stiens says:

    AI will be summarily dismissed like those investment professionals who did not follow the herd during past bubbles.

    The madness of crowds and their mounds of cash will always overwhelm rational thinking regardless of the source!

    1. Larry Cao, CFA says:

      Gary, thanks for visiting our blog and share your thoughts. We did not specifically cover the issue your raised in this three-part series, a first among the questions raised so far on all platforms since we published the second post last Friday.

      We actually implied “rational” models would beat the herd. This is of course a simplification, the rationale is not that different to what Buffett’s recent comment on cryptocurrrncies (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/10/buffett-says-cyrptocurrencies-will-almost-certainly-end-badly.html) – don’t bet against the bubbles in the short term but over time and on average market efficiency rules.

      It is also a simplification in terms of the AI models’ rationality. They don’t have to be but they can be while it is very hard for us humans to be as rational.

      As to whether AI will beat human investors eventually, I’d like to quote Luke Ellis of Man’s Group in closing: “My hope is always that there will be parts that humans do that AI doesn’t do,” But, he adds, “I wouldn’t bet my life on it.”

      Warm regards,
      Larry

  4. Bhavik says:

    If AI is superior to humans, then AI would need humans to participate in market to generate returns like AI does today (where majority of market is still held by humans). If AI will start holding that majority then market would become rational and AI shouldn’t be able to generate this kind of returns afterwards.

    From this blog, if AI surpasses humans then P0 ~= V0 should be a reality.

    1. Larry Cao, CFA says:

      AI has a way of surprising us, particularly in terms of how fast things can develop. What will happen when there is one investor left in the market? That is now a legitimate question to ponder about.

  5. shengyang says:

    if there would be only one investor(the last AI), there will be no market, because there should be at least one counterpart to exist for a market to be formed. So AI will be the terminator of market.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close