Discussions on whether certain banks remain “too-big-to-fail” now include whether these banks (and executives responsible for their actions) have also become “too-big-to-jail.”
In a recent Bloomberg article Simon Johnson, a member of the CFA Institute-co-sponsored Systemic Risk Council discusses an approach within the U.S. Department of Justice that sheds troubling light on how decisions to prosecute are made.
The Justice Department’s approach to sanctioning is not new. As noted in earlier blog posts on penalties for UBS and RBS, the Libor-rigging scandal has resulted in mostly modest fines and public outrage, rather than prosecuting those at the core of the scandal.
Linda Rittenhouse, JD, was a director of capital markets policy at CFA Institute. She focused primarily on issues related to investment products and investment regulation. Rittenhouse holds a JD degree.
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
1 thought on “Does Our Justice System Reinforce “Too-Big-to-Jail”?”
This honestly answered my issue, thank you!